public health and health promotion

Topic: public health and health promotion

Criterion    5    4
3    2    1    0
Key messages
weighting X4    Presenters conduct a session which is clear and appropriate, demonstrating that they have a very high understanding of all the key messages in the reading.    Presenters conduct a session which is mostly clear and appropriate,  demonstrating that they have a reasonable understanding of the key messages in the reading    Presenters conduct a session which is mixed, with some sections clear and appropriate, while others suggest there are some key messages the presenters are unfamiliar with and  a more thorough interrogation of information is required.    Presenters a very limited session, suggesting a much more thorough interrogation of the key messages is required.    Presentation is problematic, suggesting a much more thorough interrogation of the key messages is required.    Not
stated
Engaging peers in the learning process
weighting X6    Presenters successfully engage their peers in the learning process with interactive approaches suited to the topic and content. Presenters linked the activity to the learning process    Presenters successfully engage their peers in the learning process for most of the activity with interactive approaches suited to the topic and content. Presenters partially linked the activity to the learning process    Presenters engage their peers in the learning process for some of the activity with interactive approaches suited to the topic and content. Presenters made some  links from the activity to the learning process    Presenters engage their peers in the learning process to a degree but the approaches involved limited interaction or not suited to the topic and content. Presenters  did not    make  links from the activity to the learning process    Presenters did not engage their peers in the learning process during the activity with approaches not suited to the topic or content. Presenters did not make  links from the activity to the learning process    No activity conducted
Ensuring understanding of key issues
weighting X4    Presenters have ensured that their peers understand the key issues introduced in the allocated reading. At several times throughout the presentation     Presenters have ensured that their peers understand the key issues introduced in the allocated reading a few times throughout the presentation    Presenters have ensured that their peers understand the key issues introduced in the allocated reading occasionally throughout the presentation    Presenters have not ensured that their peers understand the key issues introduced in the allocated reading although repeated key issues at times.     Presenters have not ensured that their peers understand the key issues introduced in the allocated reading and made no summary of the key points.      Presenters did  not engage with the key issues and present these to the participants
Allocation of time
weighting X2    The presentation utilises the allocated time effectively (15 minutes).
The presenters deviate outside the allocated time minimally (e.g.  by a minute), either below or above the 15 minutes.
The presenters deviate outside the time limit in a time that is more than minimal (e.g. by 2 minutes).    The presenters deviate outside the time limit in a significant amount of time (e.g. by 3-4 minutes).    The presenters deviate outside the time limit by a large margin (e.g. by 5+ minutes).    Not
stated
Respond to questions
weighting X2    Presenters have responded appropriately to questions from the tutor and/or students.    Presenters have generally responded to the questions well, with a few minor lapses in communication. These could be fixed with closer attention to the reading.    Attempts to answer questions were evidence, however, lapses in responses detracted from the professionalism of the presentation.    Attempts to answer questions poor and inconsistent, demonstrating a limited grasp of the content. Seek help in remedying this issue before submitting your next assignment.    Little to no attempts to answer questions. Frequent inconsistencies demonstrate a poor grasp of the content. Seek help in remedying this issue before submitting your next assignment.    Not
stated
Professionalism
– writing,
spelling,
grammar
weighting X2    Presentation is professional and includes an ‘X’ factor in delivering key messages effectively to a tertiary audience. All spelling and grammar is correct.     Presentation is mostly professional, with minimal errors in spelling/punctuation/grammar. A final edit to eliminate all errors would enhance the professionalism of this presentation.    Presentation needs improving. Several errors evident with regard to spelling/punctuation/grammar. Careful editing could lift the standard of this presentation to a higher level.
Writing and presentation is unsatisfactory, with frequent spelling/punctuation/grammar. This presentation requires careful editing to lift it to a more professional standard.    Writing and presentation is unsatisfactory, with frequent spelling/punctuation/grammar.
Seek help in remedying this issue before submitting your next assignment.    Not
Stated

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply